This is default featured slide 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured slide 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured slide 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

Wednesday, 4 September 2013

Radicalisation sans borders

Radicalisation sans borders 

By: Naseer Memon (The News, Political Economy section: 1st Sept 2013)


If anything that has gripped the whole world with alarming intensity, it is nothing but a rapid rise of radicalisation. It is no more confined to Islamic countries of Asia, Africa and Middle East. The so-called free world is emerging as a hotbed of radicalisation.

The post-9/11 war against terrorism has in fact provided it a new impetus and the world has witnessed a far more violent form of radicalisation in the recent years. It would be unrealistic to trace the genesis of this phenomenon in a single incident. In fact, an assortment of complex historical and socio-political factors has shaped and nurtured the current wave.

In its current form, radicalisation is no more a localised issue of tribal areas of Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen. Although these areas are believed to be epicenters of Islamic radicalisation, Europe and the US cannot be fully absolved of their role, specially in the context of Pakistan that was chosen as a surrogate battlefield for their wars in Afghanistan.

The US and its allies even circumvented their much avowed affection for democracy and human rights by underpinning unconstitutional military regimes in Pakistan during 80s and 2000. Their myopic and strayed foreign policy has actually done a disservice and culminated in a global whirlpool of extremism. The US and Europe are now facing a serious internal challenge of containing extremism in their own countries. Thickly populated Muslim cities and neighborhoods in these countries engendered various forms of extremism that occasionally erupt into violent incidents.

Dream city of London can be a pertinent example to cite. Visiting the salubrious city as a tourist is a feast but peeping into lives of Pakistani community dampens the verve of recreation. Pakistani immigrants’ neighbourhoods paint a grim picture, where one finds all reasons of consternation. Retrogressive social milieu prevails even after decades when first generation of Pakistanis arrived here. During those heydays, Pakistani community earned respect for their hard work and amity.

Pakistani students were known for their stellar performance. Gone are those old good days and almost everything has degenerated. Pakistanis are now besmirched and stigmatised with social and political ills. Youth delinquency has surged, religious extremism has skyrocketed, women fenced in four walls, education attainment on rock bottom and social integration is unraveling at alarming pace. Seminaries are multiplying and formal schooling is being eclipsed by substandard teachings. A generation is growing in social seclusion of Pakistani and Muslim enclaves where identity crisis looms with all perils. Equally appalling is the situation in other cities like Bradford, Manchester etc.

France has the highest Muslim population among European countries, where some six million Muslims are living, mostly with North African origin. Social indicators of French Muslim are believed to be a major cause of disgruntlement. From education to employment, Muslims are disadvantaged. As a consequence, Muslim identity is proliferating with an alarming vengeance.

The post-9/11 developments have globally demarcated new borders between Muslims and the rest. Uncanny strategic shift of super powers between 1979 and 2001 wars triggered ideological tremors. The jihad espoused by the US and West coddled during the cold war era and patronised more vehemently in 80s refused to wilt with the demise of socialist Soviet Union.

As Allies failed to produce one right out of two wrongs, extremism found new legitimacy among the faithful in the wake of post-9/11 wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Even second and third generation of European and American Muslims obviously could not remain insulated from the tide. Gradually a piqued Muslim identity started obscuring other domains of social fabric in these countries. Organic process of assimilation rapidly reversed over the years and now vanishing with the speed of light.

A survey of British Muslims conducted in October 2006 found that 82 per cent of respondents believed that the British Muslims have become more politically radicalised and 81 per cent believe the war on terror is really a war on Islam. Several other surveys confirm a similar trend among British Muslims. An abominable carnage of 7/7 that claimed more than 50 lives sent shockwaves throughout the Europe that did not fully recover from the nightmare of 9/11. The gruesome incident proved that security shields alone can’t clamp religiosity and the Britain is infested with radicals whose machinations could outsmart its fastidious systems.

Radicalisation among Muslim youth is not confined to Britain only; it has straddled across other European countries. According to a recent report of the International Herald Tribune, a large number of young Muslims with Western passport are sneaking into Syria to reinforce rebel crusaders who have waged a war against the government of Bashar al Assad. Some European and American Intelligence officials claim that more Westerners are fighting in Syria than have fought in Afghanistan, Iraq and Yemen. Various sources estimate that the number of fighters from Europe, North America and Australia fighting in Syria is more than 600. French Interior Minister Manuel Valls termed it a “ticking bomb”.

The phenomenon of radicalisation in Europe is not so simple and does not have single complexion or a linear trajectory. A research report “Radicalisation of Muslim Immigrants in Europe and Russia: Beyond Terrorism” (PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 29) challenges the notion that radicalisation is merely an outcome of social disintegration among various ethnic communities in Europe. In fact it implicitly berates the approach and quotes examples where well-integrated second and third generation citizens were found involved in terrorist acts.

The report postulates that the issue is intertwined with global political panorama. The report reads “while some of their own socio-cultural experiences may prepare them to advance what they believe is the cause of fellow Muslims suffering around the world, violent Islamists frame their actions in a quasi-religious, politicised, and almost “neo-anti-imperialist” discourse of global confrontation with the West, shaped and visualised, above all, by what they see happening daily in places such as Iraq and Afghanistan.”

These factors are creating a new gulf among Muslims and other communities, which leads towards a precarious disintegration and friction. A radical Muslim identity is snowballing with every passing day and Nato’s exit from Afghanistan in 2014 would inculcate a sense of triumph and bestow it with a new pinnacle.

Islamic extremism is also breading a reciprocating anti-Muslim extremism. According to surveys, perceptions about Muslims among non-Muslims have grown. In 2008, 52 per cent in Spain 50 per cent in Germany, 38 per cent in France and 23 per cent in the UK felt negative about Muslims, considering them a threat to Western civilization.

Vagaries of the US and European foreign policy have resulted in this unmanageable global chaos. For decades, religiosity was eulogized as a bulwark against communism. Muslim countries were made a dumping ground of religious obscurantist elements, without realising that it will not remain in endless hibernation. It resurrected with ferocity of inconceivable proportions and now refuses to recoil.

In a globalized world, it is impossible to preclude tenacity of such congenital sentiments. In fact post-cold war follies of the West have revived the Pan Islamist fervour with a profound gusto. Religious radicalisation seems to have dwarfed all barriers and poses far reaching ramifications for posterity. 

(The author is an analyst and civil society activist: nmemon2004@yahoo.com)

The battle for Pakistan's agriculture

The battle for Pakistan's agriculture 
by Najma Sadeque

The first battle never really took off even after 66 years - restoring unduly appropriated land to the tiller - and a second more destructive and far-reaching battle is already upon us. Monoculture killed three-fourths of global biodiversity and soils: GM can only hasten extinction.


In recent decades, the sovereignty of many countries has been undermined by the bullying impositions of corporations backed by their own governments. This extends to forcing the adoption of so-called “level playing ground” rules that cannot apply to our socio-economic and environmental conditions: fictitious “equal standing” is simply not possible between unequals.


After a long struggle, during which time the US government tried to push sanctions against the European Union if it banned or discouraged GM crops (from USA), the EU finally prevailed. And last week, financial news agencies reported on hedge funds and insider traders dumping Monsanto stock, driving prices down. That includes Monsanto’s own CEO Hugh Grant selling off 40,000 of his own company’s shares, followed by other high-level executives. Worse is expected to follow.


The reasons were the same as elsewhere - the hazards that GMOs pose to human, animal and environmental health, Monsanto’s dangerous experiments that have lead to widespread GM pollution and cancer, and its predatory business practices. No longer welcome in Europe while facing rising opposition at home, Monsanto’s last hope for market lies in developing countries such as ours, where regulation is weak.


There is an interesting similarity to Monsanto’s powers of persuasion used in USA, India and Pakistan. Monsanto has long been ‘cosy’ with US Congressmen, getting its way entirely throughout, and helpfully eased through by former Monsanto executives vaulted to government.


In India, the push to introduce Bt cotton was also engineered from top officialdom, but it was not easy. India is a huge country with many fiercely independent states, all with a strong and informed say, turning the entire farmers’ communities and public interest groups against Monsanto. While it still prevails perforce in some areas with Bt cotton, it has failed with GM food crops; and given the 200,000 farmer suicides to-date, its days seem to be numbered.


Similarly, in Pakistan, the National Biosafety Committee and other regulators are under great pressure to approve GM crops. There was quite a hue and cry in 2011 when Monsanto was exposed to have written the biotech report, which was circulated for unilateral approval without being examined in-depth. But it takes two to clap hands; the head of PARC and the Vice Chancellor of Faisalabad University had thrown their full support behind GM crops.


There are 61 federal and provincial agricultural agencies (led originally by Pakistan Agriculture Research Council (PARC) and National Agricultural Research Centre (NARC), which were devolved to the provinces in 2010. Now PARC is trying to get an extraordinary position for itself at the federal level as an umbrella organisation over all other agencies from where it will be easier to impose decisions onto the provinces. For the same reason, foreign interests such as USAID, therefore, prefer working with all-encompassing federal institutions.


This effort is remindful of the recent furore over the Farmer Assurance Provision, recently signed into law by President Barack Obama. But it had little to assure farmers with and more with boosting big agro-chemical corporations, so that it earned the title of “Monsanto Protection Act”. A provision was anonymously and secretively slipped into a resolution, as part of the Agricultural Appropriations Bill. It turned out to be a special interest loophole about which most lawmakers were unaware when they signed it. Over a quarter of million outraged US citizens then signed a petition launched by the “Food Democracy Now” network demanding the President veto it.


Why were people so angry? The provision shielded big biotech companies like Monsanto from legal action, even if a particular product proved to be harmful to humans or the environment. For the period that the provision is in place, both the Department of Agriculture and the courts are rendered powerless to stop Monsanto from producing or selling the product, no matter how toxic. The Congress actually blocked the judiciary from doing its job! According to Al-Jazeera, the provision was partly drafted by Monsanto and sneaked in through their insider friends, bypassing the necessary review from Congress' Agricultural or Judiciary Committees.


Later, the Chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee, Senator Barbara Ann Mikulski, offered her apologies, claiming she did not put the offending text in and did not support it either. So, why was she so careless as to let it get through without it being discussed?


Fortunately, the provision is effective only until. By then, activists will be fighting hard to prevent it being made permanent, just as activists here will have to ensure that PARC does not become the sole decision-maker and law unto itself like the corrupted agricultural regulatory authorities in the US.


Ijaz Ahmed Rao is one such committed activist-farmer, who took it on himself to keep farmers, government decision-makers, agricultural institutions, the media and concerned citizens informed of global and local developments, good and bad, through his press writings and extensive email network - not the easiest task in an area that does not arouse strong feelings the way power politics does.


A graduate of Charles Stuart University, Australia, and a professional farmer in Bahawalpur for the last 15 years, he became interested in agro-biotechnology early on when he found his preference for organic farming difficult to pursue without government technical backup and in difficult terrain dependant on toxic river water, highly-polluted by industrial and agro-chemical runoff. He hoped to find solutions in gene technology, and initially supported the introduction of GM crops in Pakistan. But experience, controversies and data from independent sources and events since 2007 changed his mind: he concluded the technology was overhyped and MNCs were misrepresenting facts.


Between a billion and two billion rupees - all taxpayer money - is spent annually on Pakistan’s agricultural agencies to do research and related work. And though they will offer a list of impressive projects, some in collaboration with “foreign” establishments, they do not include what smallholder peasants or farmers like Ijaz Rao really need or want, such as organic farming, something they could revive with Cuba’s help, today the global leader and teacher in advanced techniques.


“Large-scale GM trials have still not been conducted in Pakistan and the process is being bulldozed so that everything is approved before the new government realises what’s really going on,” adds Rao.


Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif has, reportedly, refused to give in to the GM lobby. If that’s true, stakeholders may not immediately lose the battle over Pakistan’s agriculture after all.

Friday, 30 August 2013

Ex-servicemen voices against military operation in Karachi

Bhatta Khor, parchi mafia destroying investment climate in Pakistan: PESA
Engaging Rangers, FC on police duties leave borders unguarded, force demoralised
Amnesty to Pakistani Taliban probably the only option that government can offer


Dated: August 30

The Pakistan Ex-Servicemen Association (PESA) on Thursday said social or economic development is not possible until the worsening law and order situation is brought under total control.

Extortion and kidnaping for ransom has dented the investment climate which must be eliminated as major business centres and leading entrepreneurs are the worst victims of extortionists, it said.

Handing over of Karachi to the Army or targeted operations will not work unless civilian intelligence agencies do their jobs of pin pointing master minds.

This was observed in a meeting of the Executive Council of PESA with Lt Gen Ali Kuli Khan in chair. Vice Admiral Ahmad Tasnim. SJ & Bar, Air Marshal Masood Akhtar, Lt Gen Naeem Akbar, Brig Mian Mahmud, Ambassador Mr Salim Nawaz Gandapur, Brig Simon Sharaf, Brig Masud ul Hassan Major Farouk Hamid Khan and others were also present in the meeting.

The former military leaders appreciated Federal government’s plans to take nation into confidence over issue of terrorism through an All Parties Conference.

However, the government must announce its policy of dealing with terrorism in advance so that it can get input and masses could study implications. 

PESA has prepared comprehensive policy documents for dealing with terrorism and declaration of vital national interests. Detailed presentations have already been made for Mr Nawaz Sharif, PTI Chief Mr Imran Khan, Mr Raza Rabbani, Mr Shah Mahmud Qureshi and Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee and others.

The meeting observed that entire nation wants a quick end to the on-going war on terror through peaceful means. PESA do not oppose peace though talks but find it difficult to understand, what the government can offer to Taliban except amnesty of sorts.

The government must get approval from masses before accepting any demands of Taliban as the move could affect entire spectrum of our society and basic values, it was demanded.

Members expressed concern over employment of the Civil Armed Forces (CAF) like Pakistan Rangers and Frontier Corps on police duties for prolonged duration which is affecting their professional capabilities and morale and resulting in leaky borders paving way for smuggling of arms and ammunition, other items and free flow of terrorists.

Instead of relying on CAF, the provinces should increase strength of their police and give them better training and equipment. Furthermore, creation of a special federal force should help in relieving civilian armed forces from police duties but that should not become rebirth of the notorious FSF.

Former servicemen  were of the opinion that the on-going judicial cases against the force have a demoralizing effect.

Thursday, 29 August 2013

Embassies, IWCCI to jointly take women empowerment initiatives

Pakistani women have great potential to spark economic growth

Islamabad: August 29

Women's economic empowerment has a crucial role in the socio-economic development of Pakistan therefore we have decided to cooperate with the IWCCI to meet the noble objective.

This was the crux of the speeches delivered by the spouses of Ambassador of Australia, Indonesia and Sri Lanka at a function organised by Islamabad Women Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

Speaking to businesswomen, Ms. Susan Heyward, Herry Listyawati, and Kumari Weerakkody said that we will jointly take steps to ensure capacity building and empowerment of women so that they can play their due role in the national development.

They said that supporting entrepreneurship is the best way to empower women which helps them realise their potential and fulfil their aspirations.

“We will enrich the women with practical skills for future livelihood endeavours,” they said adding that we will look into introducing some unique income-generating projects for local women.

Advancing women’s participation in all walks of life has become imperative without which a country cannot develop, they observed.

Speaking at the occasion, founder president and incumbent President of the IWCCI Samina Fazil and Farida Rashid said that Pakistani women needs improved access to education, health care and economic resources so that culture of discrimination can be successfully eliminated.

They called upon the developed countries to help business chambers enhance their technical capacity and organizational capability so that businesswomen may not face serious hardships in future.

The leaders of women entrepreneurs said that we are committed to increasing the opportunities and well-being of women and consider gender equality as an integral part of sustainable development.

We will continue to raise public awareness, try to gain influence with decision makers, support and promote women’s leadership agenda, and advocate for a change, said Samina Fazil and Farida Rashid.

Women comprise more than 50 per cent of total population but they have been forced into a systemic gender subordination which has pushed Pakistan at the bottom of Global Gender Gap Report.

Women need to be included in economic activities in order for countries to truly experience development and peace, said Farida Rashid.

Rs. 82 billion OGRA Scam or a bust bubble

Campaign against SECP can dent investors’ confidence

There has been recent outburst in the newspapers in the matter of trading of shares of SNGPL and SSGCL in reference to OGRA Scandal where SECP and its officials including former Chairman have been alleged to be involved. A trail of all the correspondence, reports prepared and investigations revealed that all of the stories were misleading and without any grounds. Over last few months a calculated campaign has been orchestrated to malign the senior management and belittle the role of SECP as corporate and securities market watch dog. The falseand baseless reports were published without verification and taking the version of SECP or senior officials who were being defamed. Such reports and news items and disparaging remarks against senior SECP officers have adverse impact on market and can seriously dent the investor confidence.

Surprisingly the role of SECP and its senior officials in the matter of SNGPL and SSGCL have deliberately portrayed in negative light in the press and have been subjected to an unnecessarymedia trial. The fact of the matter is that the SECP had been monitoring the trading in shares of SNGPL and SSGCL as far back as 2009. The preliminary assessment report in 2009 found nothing unusual in the trading pattern. In the subsequent assessment reports of 2010 and 2011 there were no concrete findings and were inconclusive. Having said that the relevant officerrequested for further probe in the matter, which after thorough review was not ceded to on account of insufficient cause/reason for further probe.

However, in view of press reports alleging illegal changes in UFG by OGRA resulting in loss of 42 billion to national exchequer and billions of profits to some brokers and in light of the pending probe in matter of OGRA by National Accountability Bureau, the SECP in exercise of powers under the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act 1997 and the Securitiesand Exchange Ordinance 1969 vide order dated January 18, 2013 initiated an investigation into trading of shares of SNGPL and SSGCL during the period from July 1, 2010 till December 31, 201. Upon completion of the investigation a detailed report was submitted by the investigation officers on May 29, 2013.

As per investigation report, in the case of SSGCL, during the year 2010 and 2011 a total of 228.945 million shares were traded at KSE for a total value of Rs. 5,354.607 million. The scrip touched its highest level of Rs. 30.70 on September 30, 2010 and lowest level of Rs. 13.04 on January 18, 2010. In case of SNGPL, during the said period a total of 155.936 million shares were traded at KSE for a total value of Rs. 4,443.403 million. The scrip price touched its highest level of Rs. 36.60 on March 29, 2010 and lowest level of Rs. 15.25 on December 16, 2011.

The Enquiry Officers after thoroughly reviewing the transactions and trading data including telephone recordings and after meeting and having recorded statements of many individualsand entities which were accused to be involved, found no instance of market manipulation during the Review Period. No instance of pumping and dumping, creation of artificial market, false or misleading appearance of active trading, artificial inducement or depression of price, or any act which constitutes a criminal offence under section 17 of the Securities and Exchange Ordinance 1969 has been reported by Enquiry Officers.

After analyses of the relevant record including the research reports and information relating to OGRA determined that buying by NBP and NIT-SEF was due to change in the company’s fundamentals which created a demand supply disequilibrium resulting price escalation and drawing interest from sellers. The announcement of cash and bonus dividend by SSGCL and SNGPL were also the factors that attracted investor and escalated the prices. The Enquiry officers have said that the news of UFG calculations was already in public domain as it is proved from the research reports of the various brokerage houses and therefore, there was a general expectancy of appreciation in the price of the shares which drew interest from the buyers.

No adverse findings were reported against National Bank of Pakistan or NIT-SEF. A minor instance of insider trading against a brokerage house while the Enquiry officers have alsorecommended to further looking into four individuals for front running of funds of SSGC. The SECP has also carried out a review of the Investigation report that too has not resulted in any meaningful exercise and no other findings other than the report itself were made. The Review has actually endorsed the findings of the Enquiry Officers who prepared this report. The copy the Report and the Review report has been shared with the NAB and Policy Board members in addition to submission of the same to Sindh High Court in compliance to its order. The copy of the Report, Review Report and other documents are available with this scribe. 

The figures given in the press reports are exaggerated and mostly without any basis, as per the SECP report the entire value of shares traded during the period under review i.e. one year amounts to Rs. 9798 million i.e. Rs. 9.7 billion. The value of shares traded during the 90 day period around the UFG rate change is obviously much less than that. Further in presence of such low volumes in the market, there is hardly any chance of manipulation.

Allegations of conflict of interest have been leveled against the present SECP management especially one of the Commissioners in the media, however, interestingly at the time of the occurrence of this scam, the concerned official was not even in the service of SECP. This fact has also been clarified by the SECP to NAB, along with other information while assisting NAB in Tauqeer Saddiq case. The objective behind the whole affair is not known to anyone but rivalry between the two business groups has severally impacted the integrity and credibility of the SECP as an institution and as a regulator.

Wednesday, 28 August 2013

Who is responsible for the mockery of booking journalists on charges of terrorism?

The Balochistan government has registered a case under the Anti-Terrorism Act against the chief executive and three other employees of a television channel, ARY Digital, for releasing a documentary about the attack on the former residency of the father of the nation. The three other employees are the Executive Director, Owais Tohid, the Quetta bureau chief, Shahid Hameed Rind and the Islamabad bureau chief Sabir Shakir.

A mystery has arisen as there is a great deal of confusion as to who actually ordered the registration of the case against the journalists. The Balochistan provincial government stated that it acted on instructions from the Supreme Court however, the Supreme Court denies that it made any such order.

Balochistan's provincial information department alleged in an FIR that ARY News, in its current affairs programme on Aug 13, ran "objectionable video clips" released by an outlawed outfit about the destruction of the Ziarat Residency after an attack in June.

A spokesman for the chief minister of Balochistan clarified that Dr Abdul Malik Baloch had no role in the registration of the FIR. Jan Mohammad Buledi, the spokesman, said: "The case against ARY News was registered on the Supreme Court's orders."

Today, August 27, 2013, the Chief Justice of Pakistan announced in open court that he had not ordered the case to be registered. He also asked the authorities to make inquiries into who did order the FIR to be registered.

The possible cause of this confusion was the strong protests by the journalists, civil society and some politicians which have forced the Supreme Court and the government of Balochistan to place the responsibility for the FIR on each other. There is actual evidence to show that the Supreme Court has for some time been taking a position against the freedom of expression by the media and the lawyer's community.

After the change of government the Chief Justice has diverted his attention towards the media, particularly towards the electronic media in the background of their debates on biased and tilted decisions of the courts. There have been some decisions where the benches of the Supreme Court, headed by the Chief Justice have not heard the other side of the legal arguments and have given one-sided decisions. Such decisions have provoked the lawyer's community who are agitating against 'dictatorial' decisions of the apex court. The electronic media has been providing sizeable coverage to the lawyer's critical point of view.

One of the points the lawyers are objecting to is the continuous use of contempt of court rulings and Sou Moto actions of the Supreme Court which bars the concept of fair trial. The Chief Justice has also started using these methods against the media and the journalists which has infuriated both civil society actors and media personnel and it is widely believed that this is just another way of squeezing the freedom of expression. Civil society actors believe that whereas in the past it was the military government that was controlling freedom of expression it is now the Supreme Court through contempt of court rulings and Sou Motoactions and it is necessary to note that these actions became more common when the media agitated for the prosecution of the Chief Justice's son on corruption charges.

Due to the timely and loud protests of the civil society the Chief Justice had to reconsider his position and even retreat. The actual position is that the Supreme Court of Pakistan has taken notice of programme on the Ziarat Residency aired by the ARY Channel and issued notice to the chief executive officer through an expeditious mode of service for August 15 to appear before the court and explain as to why proceedings may not be ordered against ARY in the national and public interests. The apex court also issued notices to the chairman of the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) to appear in person and explain as to what action is called for in view of the above facts.

ARY fearing action from PEMRA approached the Islamabad High Court and got a stay order from anyone taking action against it. The question which begs to be asked is as to why, in the presence of the stay order, the Supreme Court allegedly forced the government of Balochistan to file cases against the media personnel on charges of terrorism. The spokesperson of the chief minister of Balochistan has stated clearly that the case was registered on the orders of the Supreme Court and not on the orders of the chief minister.

It is on record that for the restoration of the Chief Justice and the independence of the judiciary one of the major factors was the use of the freedom of expression by the media houses and journalists against the repression by the military government. It appears that the Chief Justice who benefitted from this freedom of expression is now trying to strangle it to suit his own ends. The lawyers are also complaining that the Chief Justice is overstepping his mandate by interfering in political matters. According to the lawyer's community freedom of expression appears to becoming the main hindrance for the Chief Justice to put a halt to fair trial and his attempts to grab executive power.

The Asian Human Rights Commission calls for an independent inquiry commission into the question of who ordered the FIR and the filing of a case in the anti-terrorism court against the journalists and ARY. The AHRC would also ask the Chief Justice to remember that it was freedom of expression that restored him to his exalted position. It is the prerogative of the editorial board of any media house to decide what materials should be used and how much coverage it should be given and this cannot be decided upon or governed through the regulations of PEMRA or the orders of the courts. Every institution has its own boundaries. If freedom of expression is denied there will be no question of rule of law, fair trial and justice for the people.

Al-Shifa team leaves for Mauritius to treat patients with eye disorders

Sight of girl who lost vision in acid attack restored employing new technique

RAWALPINDI (August 27) 

A team of highly skilled doctors and surgeons has left for Mauritius to treat patients with eye and sight disorders.

The team is led by Prof. Dr. Wajid Ali Khan, Chief Consultant and Dean of Al-Shifa Trust Eye Hospital which will remain there for one week to serve the ailing humanity and conduct cornea transplant and vitro retinal surgery free of cost.

This will be the sixth mission sent to the friendly country by Al Shifa Hospital on the request of Ministry of Health and Quality of Life of Mauritius.

Dr. Wajid Ali Khan, the team leader, is a world renowned eye surgeon who has been awarded “Sitara-i-Imtiaz” by the Government of Pakistan and many foreign institutions have acknowledged his contribution.

He recently drew world attention by employing a new technique on a girl to restore her sight which she lost in an acid attack.

It may be mentioned that after realising the positive impact of Al Shifa teams on the lives of people with eye disorders, the Ministry of Health and Quality of Life of Mauritius entered into a long term collaborative agreement with the hospital to facilitate regular visits of doctors and transfer of patients with complicated cases to Pakistan.

The agreement also includes training and capacity building of Mauritian doctors and paramedical staff.

Latest figures released by the Mauritian health authorities reveal that one person in three suffers from diabetes mellitus (or sugar diabetes), which means that the level of glucose in their blood is abnormally high.

This causes blood vessels in the body to become fragile and liable to rupture. When this occurs in the retinal blood vessels, visual impairment may result which is called diabetic retinopathy.